SOC 2 Compliance for AI Agent Deployments
SOC 2 compliance for AI agent deployments requires demonstrating that autonomous software agents operate under the same logical access controls, monitoring, and change management as human operators. SafeClaw by Authensor maps directly to SOC 2 Trust Service Criteria by enforcing deny-by-default policies on every agent action, producing hash-chained audit logs for monitoring evidence, and storing policies as version-controlled code for change management traceability.
Quick Start
npx @authensor/safeclaw
SOC 2 Trust Service Criteria Mapping
CC6.1 — Logical Access Security
SOC 2 requires logical access controls that restrict system access to authorized individuals and systems. SafeClaw enforces this at the action level:
version: "1.0"
description: "SOC 2 CC6.1 — Logical access controls"
rules:
- action: file.read
path: "src/**"
effect: allow
reason: "CC6.1: Scoped read access to application source"
- action: file.write
path: "src/**"
effect: allow
reason: "CC6.1: Scoped write access to application source"
- action: file.read
path: "secrets/**"
effect: deny
reason: "CC6.1: Block agent access to credential stores"
- action: shell.execute
command: "sudo *"
effect: deny
reason: "CC6.1: Prevent privilege escalation"
- action: "*"
effect: deny
reason: "CC6.1: Deny-by-default baseline"
Every action request is evaluated against this policy before execution. Denied actions never reach the underlying system.
CC6.3 — Role-Based Access
Map agent roles to specific policies:
# roles/production-agent.yaml
version: "1.0"
description: "Production agent — read-only with deployment capability"
rules:
- action: file.read
path: "dist/**"
effect: allow
reason: "CC6.3: Read built artifacts"
- action: shell.execute
command: "kubectl apply *"
effect: allow
reason: "CC6.3: Deploy to production cluster"
- action: shell.execute
command: "kubectl delete *"
effect: deny
reason: "CC6.3: Block destructive production operations"
- action: "*"
effect: deny
CC7.2 — System Monitoring
SafeClaw's audit trail satisfies continuous monitoring requirements. Every action evaluation is logged:
npx @authensor/safeclaw audit export --format json --since "30 days"
Log entries include timestamp, action type, target resource, policy decision, matched rule, and hash chain link. Auditors can verify no entries were tampered with using:
npx @authensor/safeclaw audit verify
CC8.1 — Change Management
Policies stored in Git provide complete change history:
git log --oneline .safeclaw/
Each policy change shows who made it, when, and through what review process. Branch protection rules ensure policy changes require approval before merging.
CC7.3 — Evaluate and Communicate
Generate periodic compliance summaries:
npx @authensor/safeclaw audit summary --since "quarter"
This outputs total evaluations, allow/deny ratios, top denied actions, and policy drift indicators — exactly what SOC 2 reviewers need for their evaluation narratives.
Evidence Package for Auditors
When preparing for a SOC 2 audit, assemble this evidence from SafeClaw:
- Policy files — Current
.safeclaw/*.yamldemonstrating access controls - Git history — Policy change log showing change management process
- Audit log export — 90-day action log with hash chain integrity
- Verification report — Output of
audit verifyconfirming log integrity - Summary statistics — Quarterly summary showing enforcement effectiveness
Implementation Checklist
- [ ] Install SafeClaw: npx @authensor/safeclaw
- [ ] Define policies per CC6.1 (logical access)
- [ ] Create role-specific policies per CC6.3
- [ ] Enable audit logging (default: on)
- [ ] Configure log retention (minimum 90 days)
- [ ] Add policy validation to CI pipeline
- [ ] Schedule quarterly audit exports
- [ ] Document policy review cadence
Why SafeClaw
- 446 tests covering policy evaluation, audit logging, and hash chain integrity
- Deny-by-default satisfies CC6.1 requirement for explicit access authorization
- Sub-millisecond evaluation ensures compliance does not impact system performance
- Hash-chained audit trail provides CC7.2 monitoring evidence with tamper detection
- Works with Claude AND OpenAI — consistent controls regardless of LLM provider
- MIT licensed — no proprietary dependencies in your compliance scope
See Also
- AI Agent Compliance Reporting: What Auditors Need
- Audit Trail Requirements for AI Agents in Regulated Industries
- Building an AI Governance Framework with SafeClaw
- Hash-Chained Audit Logs for AI Agents
Try SafeClaw
Action-level gating for AI agents. Set it up in your browser in 60 seconds.
$ npx @authensor/safeclaw