2025-12-29 · Authensor

How to Secure AI Agents for Legal Work

AI agents in legal practice access privileged communications, review confidential documents, and draft filings that carry legal consequences — a single unauthorized disclosure can waive attorney-client privilege and expose the firm to malpractice liability. SafeClaw by Authensor enforces deny-by-default policies on every action your legal AI agent attempts, ensuring confidential documents are accessible only within matter boundaries, privileged communications are never exfiltrated, and every access is logged in a hash-chained audit trail. Policy evaluation completes in sub-milliseconds, keeping legal research workflows fast.

Quick Start

npx @authensor/safeclaw

Creates a .safeclaw/ directory with deny-all defaults. Your legal agent cannot access any document, database, or external service until you define explicit allow rules scoped to specific matters.

Confidentiality Enforcement

Legal AI agents must respect matter boundaries — an agent working on Matter A should never access documents from Matter B:

# .safeclaw/policies/legal-agent.yaml
rules:
  - id: allow-current-matter-docs
    action: file.read
    effect: allow
    conditions:
      path:
        pattern: "matters/${CURRENT_MATTER_ID}/**"
    reason: "Agent can only read documents in the assigned matter"

- id: block-other-matter-docs
action: file.read
effect: deny
conditions:
path:
pattern: "matters/**"
reason: "Access to other matter documents is blocked"

- id: block-privilege-log-access
action: file.read
effect: deny
conditions:
path:
pattern: "*/privilegelog"
reason: "Privilege logs contain sensitive categorizations"

Document Access Control

Gate access based on document classification and sensitivity:

rules:
  - id: allow-public-filings
    action: file.read
    effect: allow
    conditions:
      path:
        pattern: "matters/${CURRENT_MATTER_ID}/filings/public/**"
    reason: "Public filings are readable"

- id: block-sealed-documents
action: file.read
effect: deny
conditions:
path:
pattern: "/sealed/"
reason: "Sealed documents require court authorization"

- id: allow-draft-writes
action: file.write
effect: allow
conditions:
path:
pattern: "matters/${CURRENT_MATTER_ID}/drafts/*/.{docx,md,txt}"
reason: "Agent can write drafts within the current matter"

- id: block-filed-document-edits
action: file.write
effect: deny
conditions:
path:
pattern: "matters//filed/"
reason: "Filed documents are immutable"

Privilege Protection

Prevent the agent from actions that could waive attorney-client privilege:

rules:
  - id: block-external-transmission
    action: network.request
    effect: deny
    conditions:
      destination:
        not_pattern: "{.lawfirm.internal,.westlaw.com,*.lexisnexis.com}"
    reason: "Privileged content cannot be transmitted externally"

- id: block-email-privileged
action: api.call
effect: deny
conditions:
endpoint:
pattern: "/send-email"
reason: "Agent cannot send emails — privilege waiver risk"

- id: block-third-party-ai
action: api.call
effect: deny
conditions:
endpoint:
pattern: "{api.openai.com,anthropic.com,google.com/ai}"
reason: "Privileged content must not be sent to external AI services"

Legal Research Gating

Allow controlled access to legal research databases while preventing data exfiltration:

rules:
  - id: allow-westlaw-search
    action: api.call
    effect: allow
    conditions:
      endpoint:
        pattern: ".westlaw.com/search"
      method: "GET"
    reason: "Agent can search Westlaw for case law"

- id: allow-lexis-search
action: api.call
effect: allow
conditions:
endpoint:
pattern: ".lexisnexis.com/api/search"
method: "GET"
reason: "Agent can search LexisNexis"

- id: deny-all-apis
action: api.call
effect: deny
reason: "Default deny for all other API calls"

Why SafeClaw

Cross-References

Try SafeClaw

Action-level gating for AI agents. Set it up in your browser in 60 seconds.

$ npx @authensor/safeclaw